We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ray
Per python-trio/trio#2135 (comment) and #359 it'd be kinda interesting to try out a couple things:
@ray.remote
infect_asyncio=True
asyncio
multiprocessing
mp
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Per python-trio/trio#2135 (comment) and #359 it'd be kinda
interesting to try out a couple things:
@ray.remote
threadray
(c++)spawning layer instead of using OS process APIs B)
infect_asyncio=True
style inter-loop streaming to allowdriving a remote
asyncio
task for whatever benefits itprovides (if any): https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/ray-core/actors/async_api.html?highlight=async%20for#asyncio-for-remote-tasks
Relvant
ray
related "actor" resources:https://mpolinowski.github.io/docs/IoT-and-Machine-Learning/AIOps/2023-01-26-python-ray-remote-actors/2023-01-26/
Who are the competitors? #85 (comment))
and that goes through comparisons with
multiprocessing
, thoughthey're using fancy c++ threads + shm 😂 to "out-do"
mp
:https://towardsdatascience.com/10x-faster-parallel-python-without-python-multiprocessing-e5017c93cce1
From their actual docs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: