You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am actually comparing the Open Tree of Life IDs retrieved via GNVerify and via rotl (official Open Tree of Life API).
They give almost identical results (which is good!) but sadly in some cases, they differ.
Couldn't it be that you have only the first part of the line being "Petroselinum crispum" in your data and that the "Neapolitanum Group" was cropped? It could maybe explain it...
I have the local ott3.2 version and they are present in this exact same way.
Hi,
I am actually comparing the Open Tree of Life IDs retrieved via GNVerify and via rotl (official Open Tree of Life API).
They give almost identical results (which is good!) but sadly in some cases, they differ.
Here is an example:
giving
"recordId": "959097"
where when doing it via rotl (in R):
search_string unique_name approximate_match ott_id is_synonym flags 1 petroselinum crispum Petroselinum crispum FALSE 2485 FALSE number_matches 1 1
Which indeed verifies:
https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/taxonomy/browse?name=2485
vs
https://tree.opentreeoflife.org/taxonomy/browse?name=959097
Thank you again for your wonderful work, hope those issues help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: