Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: support connecting to existing aria2c daemon #128

Closed
waltmck opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature request: support connecting to existing aria2c daemon #128

waltmck opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@waltmck
Copy link

waltmck commented Sep 25, 2024

I use aria2c as a systemd service, which I can then interact with using an RPC client such as this project. This is nice for a couple reasons: I can remotely manage downloads for a headless server over a VPN, and downloads are automatically continued and run the the background when the computer boots (without any GUI components needing to load).

You have a very nice GUI and you already run an aria2c instance internally, so why not allow connection to a daemon running in a separate process? This would be similar in spirit to to transmission-remote.

It would also allow more granular configuration by editing the aria2.conf file, giving power-users desired customization ability without cluttering the settings GUI.

@giantpinkrobots
Copy link
Owner

Hello. Connecting to a remote aria2c daemon has been supported for a while now, but on the latest version apparently I accidentally removed the option in the Preferences page and somehow didn't notice. I'm very professional as you can see.

I re-added the option in the commit 751c858 and it will be made available in the next version which I plan to release soon. Until that you can build the next branch to use this feature. It'll be under Advanced Settings.

resim

@Thesola10
Copy link

is there an ETA for a Flatpak release shipping this fix? thanks for the hard work btw

@giantpinkrobots
Copy link
Owner

is there an ETA for a Flatpak release shipping this fix? thanks for the hard work btw

Now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants