Obsoletion request: GO:1902621 actomyosin contractile ring disassembly/GO:1990274 mitotic actomyosin contractile ring disassembly

[ValWood]

Please provide as much information as you can:

• GO term ID and Label

• GO:1902621 actomyosin contractile ring disassembly
• GO:1990274 mitotic actomyosin contractile ring disassembly
• GO:0120151   positive regulation of mitotic actomyosin contractile ring disassembly
• GO:0120150 regulation of mitotic actomyosin contractile ring disassembly

• Reason for deprecation Put an x in the appropriate box:

• The reason for obsoletion is that the data from the paper for which the term was requested can be accurately described using another term 👍
• GO:0000916 actomyosin contractile ring contraction
• GO:1902404 mitotic actomyosin contractile ring contraction
• GO:1903471 regulation of mitotic actomyosin contractile ring contraction
• GO:1903473 positive regulation of mitotic actomyosin contractile ring contraction

• "Replace by" term (ID and label)
  If all annotations can safely be moved to that term

• Are there annotations to this term?

• How many EXP: 6
  PomBase 4
  SGD 2

• Are there mappings and cross references to this term? (InterPro, Keywords; check QuickGO cross-references section)

No

• Is this term in a subset? (check the AmiGO page for that term)

No

• Any other information

---

Checklist for ontology editor

Check term usage and metadata in Protégé

• check term usage in the ontology
• check internal mappings: RHEA, EC, MetaCyc
• check subset usage
• check taxon constraints

Check annotations

Annotation review ticket
geneontology/go-annotation#4915

• find external mappings (via IEAS), include in obsoletion notice

Notification

• create obsoletion announcement
• announce to GO friends (go-friends@mailman.stanford.edu)
• paste the text in the ontology ticket

[ValWood]

I asked some experts and they don't see any difference between constriction and disassembly. The ring disassembles as it constricts

[ValWood]

proceed to obsoletion, annotations will be remapped.

remove taxon constraint
GO:0000916 | actomyosin contractile ring contraction | Only in Taxon | 2759 | Eukaryota
(@pgaudet will I be able to do this? before xmas we were told to wait for taxon constraints until some change was implemented, otherwise I could go ahead with this)

[pgaudet]

I think you can go ahead and remove the taxon constraint - right @balhoff ?

[balhoff]

Yes, go ahead, it's no problem.

[ValWood]

Thanks!