You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For class detail pages, for facets like "annotation", rather than a flat list ordered descending by annotation count, it would be good to (1) indent the list of terms according to their inter-relationships and (2) remove terms not in the current lineage ( see GO-688 )
I believe we previously thought this required Solr4 (sorry if this is a dupe)
However, I don't think this is required. Everything should be there in the transitivity graph used to construct the inferred tree view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Inspired by:
For class detail pages, for facets like "annotation", rather than a flat list ordered descending by annotation count, it would be good to (1) indent the list of terms according to their inter-relationships and (2) remove terms not in the current lineage ( see GO-688 )
I believe we previously thought this required Solr4 (sorry if this is a dupe)
However, I don't think this is required. Everything should be there in the transitivity graph used to construct the inferred tree view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: