Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No dashes in strategy move names. See Fig. 21 in the paper on GTE #14

Open
stengel opened this issue Nov 12, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

No dashes in strategy move names. See Fig. 21 in the paper on GTE #14

stengel opened this issue Nov 12, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@stengel
Copy link
Member

stengel commented Nov 12, 2013

"Solved" by using commas instead of dashes. Should be a choosable parameter, blank no good
as used as separator in strategic form. Also omitted "," if moves are single letters have been implemented - although sometimes commas still appear with single letters. Not clear why.

Generated strategy names in the extensive form are too long
with the intermediate dashes. Even worse, these dashes become
long dashes in conversion from XFIG to PDF.
Solution: no dashes, just juxtaposition for single-letter
move names. At some further point, we can extend this as
follows: If a move has 2 or more letters, insert a comma
before and after, and change at the end all double commas
into single blanks and remove leading and trailing commas.
(The "comma" character should be a parameter that can later
maybe configured; use a single routine for that, which is
easy to write - the same for blanks instead of commas can
also be used to pre-process input strings that may have
multiple blanks in them.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant