From cf4dc248752141df953971e08fa3561527d3b8c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Diane Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:37:33 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index d96035a..66bd9d8 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -307,6 +307,24 @@ If you're like me and left just the contour showing, it's now time to turn on ou Here, we're going to load a style layer to connect to the "RockType" field in our data. This is tricky because some geologic knowledge is required to give this a decent shot. Just know that every field site is unique and not everything is going to match up to this particular styling file, but this is a great start. +![Loading Styling File](images/LoadingLithclasses.png) + +Yes, there are quite a few options for classiying rocks: + +![rock type color symbologies](images/Lithclasses_scaled.png) + +Now we have a bonified geologic map! + +![geologic map](images/GeologyDone.png) + +### Photos + +What does this place look like? For fun and context, I stuck in a .geojson file that merely plots the two points where these pictures were taken. You can get a bit of the on-the-ground sense of the rock outcrops by looking at these and comparing them to the geologic information on our map. + +![Picture of Dakota Formation](images/Dakota_scaled) ![Picture of Morrison contact](images/Morrison_scaled) + + +