We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I tried using the 3dgsconverter.
First i convert my .ply file with this '3dgsconverter -i input_3dgs.ply -o output_cc.ply -f cc --rgb'.
I take this output_cc.ply file and open it in cloudcompare. When cloudcompare opens i click "apply". I do some manual cleaning.
I save my file as a new file like 'cloudcompare_changes.ply'
Then i use this code to compile the 'cloudcompare_changes.ply' file back: 3dgsconverter -i cloudcompare_changes.ply -o output_3dgs.ply -f 3dgs
So i follow every step as mentioned.
But when i open my new .ply file in supersplat it looks super weired.
Any idea what i am doing wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here is thr solution:
just don't be tempted to 'rotate' / 'scale' the points while in Cloudcompare - it really mucks them up.
Case closed! :-)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I tried using the 3dgsconverter.
First i convert my .ply file with this '3dgsconverter -i input_3dgs.ply -o output_cc.ply -f cc --rgb'.
I take this output_cc.ply file and open it in cloudcompare. When cloudcompare opens i click "apply". I do some manual cleaning.
I save my file as a new file like 'cloudcompare_changes.ply'
Then i use this code to compile the 'cloudcompare_changes.ply' file back: 3dgsconverter -i cloudcompare_changes.ply -o output_3dgs.ply -f 3dgs
So i follow every step as mentioned.
But when i open my new .ply file in supersplat it looks super weired.
Any idea what i am doing wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: