You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was hopping the result would be 2 layers named layer_one and layer_two.
But the output gives:
For layer 0, using name "layer_one"
For layer 1, using name "layer_two"
For layer 2, using name "layer_one"
For layer 3, using name "layer_two"
And as stated I end up with 4 layers, with some of them sharing the same name (I don't know if it's ok for tile layers to share the same name, seems like it's working at least with mbview).
I was wondering if you think it's a good idea to modify this behavior so it is easier to merge files into separated layers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good catch! I agree that these should be getting merged into the same layer instead of having multiple layers with the same name. I'll take a look and see how straightforward it would be to make that change.
Hi, thanks for the amazing work on tippecanoe, such a great tool!
I have encounter an edge case I would like to discuss.
I have this file structure:
I run
I was hopping the result would be 2 layers named
layer_one
andlayer_two
.But the output gives:
And as stated I end up with 4 layers, with some of them sharing the same name (I don't know if it's ok for tile layers to share the same name, seems like it's working at least with
mbview
).I was wondering if you think it's a good idea to modify this behavior so it is easier to merge files into separated layers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: