You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Anyway: I think we should only include equivalence (A = B) in these two cases:
Mutual rel=me links.
Data from trusted sources. People who've logged into Identi.ca with their Twitter or Facebook accounts, for example.
There are probably some other interesting things we should include (circular equivalence (A -> B, B -> C, C -> A) probably would be good, for example), but I'd like to keep it simple for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Social Graph API had this whole graph model for showing who claimed to be whom and whether those claims were mutual and so on.
So if http://example.com/l4mer has a rel=me to http://twitter.com/justinbieber but not vice-versa, we keep that data, and don't automatically return http://example.com/l4mer if someone's asking about @JustinBieber.
Yeah, I know.
Anyway: I think we should only include equivalence (A = B) in these two cases:
There are probably some other interesting things we should include (circular equivalence (A -> B, B -> C, C -> A) probably would be good, for example), but I'd like to keep it simple for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: