Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Token Transfer and DEX Volume - Bad Metric Case #1195

Open
MSilb7 opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Token Transfer and DEX Volume - Bad Metric Case #1195

MSilb7 opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@MSilb7
Copy link
Member

MSilb7 commented Jan 2, 2025

On metrics to be cautious of - why raw token transfer volume (with stablecoin transfer volume as a subset) is a bad metric, and raw DEX volume may also be:

  • A new DEX heavily inflated stablecoin transfer volumes (2nd time this has happened to my knowledge): https://x.com/artemis/status/1874526932479644035

  • Blockworks is filtering this DEX out, identified that it has 0 fees, so people just wash on it: https://x.com/smyyguy/status/1873461468886454394

  • For token transfers: It's tough to make a "better version," because there can be 0 cost to inflate it. It's arguably easier to fake than active addresses. I'd be against any metric to do with this.

  • For DEXs: Maybe a better metric would be to just look at DEX fees, rather than DEX volume. I think Defillama has this.

Tag #1190

@MSilb7 MSilb7 changed the title Metrics to be Cautious of Token Transfer and DEX Volume - Bad Metric Case Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant