From 873b7de48b6b8255d8e59336d046c1f80fa87529 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eliza <40700626+elizarileyoak@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:27:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Update research-overview.mdx

Added link to delib process forum post
---
 pages/research/research-overview.mdx | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pages/research/research-overview.mdx b/pages/research/research-overview.mdx
index 13dc2873e..ced488742 100644
--- a/pages/research/research-overview.mdx
+++ b/pages/research/research-overview.mdx
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ As we’ve discussed above, experiments are well-suited for a specific type of q
 We’ll continue to update this section as we analyze and publish ongoing studies. Some questions we’re currently studying experimentally include: 
 
 - ***Does a deliberative process increase informed decision-making, social trust, or consensus on a contested topic?***
-    - Link to forum post summary **here**
+    - Link to forum post summary [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/when-is-deliberation-useful-for-optimism-governance/9142)
     - Link to full academic paper (coming soon!)
 - ***Does a sample of guest voters allocate resources differently than web-of-trust voters? What is the relationship between social graph connections, vote clustering, and survey data on self-dealing and collusion?***
     - Analysis and intervention underway — see forum post on R5 [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-5-expert-voting-experiment/8613) and R6 [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-6-announcing-guest-voter-participation/8816/3)