You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yo! I'm poking around for actively development memcached clients looking for some feedback for ASCII protocol changes. Looks like you've recently been redoing the old .Net client, neat!
memcached/memcached#484 - I've been developing on this for a while. I'm personally happy with the general approach and the code is at the 90% mark. What I'd love to hear now is some feedback from client authors/maintainers on how good/bad/annoying this would be to implement.
I can clear up/rewrite text/add examples if it's not clear enough right now. The protocol is low level, and I'd expect a raw-ish interface from clients. Most users will only be needing a couple of high level patterns, which should be easy to implement wrapping the raw protocol (a herd-protected get, stale-while-revalidate, etc). I haven't written these examples up explicitly yet while I look for feedback.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yo! I'm poking around for actively development memcached clients looking for some feedback for ASCII protocol changes. Looks like you've recently been redoing the old .Net client, neat!
memcached/memcached#484 - I've been developing on this for a while. I'm personally happy with the general approach and the code is at the 90% mark. What I'd love to hear now is some feedback from client authors/maintainers on how good/bad/annoying this would be to implement.
I can clear up/rewrite text/add examples if it's not clear enough right now. The protocol is low level, and I'd expect a raw-ish interface from clients. Most users will only be needing a couple of high level patterns, which should be easy to implement wrapping the raw protocol (a herd-protected get, stale-while-revalidate, etc). I haven't written these examples up explicitly yet while I look for feedback.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: