From fd9abfc8340913451f90544f3135f6760595ea7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marsdeno <41438629+marsdeno@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:25:30 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Remove unneccessary comment

---
 fortran/rules/S1.rst | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fortran/rules/S1.rst b/fortran/rules/S1.rst
index a70268f..0898433 100644
--- a/fortran/rules/S1.rst
+++ b/fortran/rules/S1.rst
@@ -6,5 +6,3 @@ Two-word control flow constructs should be written as single words.
 ``ENDIF`` rather than ``END IF``
 ``ENDDO`` rather than ``END DO``
 ``ENDWHERE`` rather than ``END WHERE``
-
-(this one makes me cry a little)

From 6dfdf8b8b51d825c4e4d389c2e78c342b6628696 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marsdeno <41438629+marsdeno@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:31:06 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Correct S2 example

Example prior to commit was not actually properly illustrating the issue.
---
 fortran/rules/S2.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fortran/rules/S2.rst b/fortran/rules/S2.rst
index 2edba31..c32bd2a 100644
--- a/fortran/rules/S2.rst
+++ b/fortran/rules/S2.rst
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ To be avoided :
 .. code-block:: fortran
    :caption: declaration order
 
-   SUBROUTINE WRONG_ORDER( ARG3, ARG2, ARG1)
+   SUBROUTINE WRONG_ORDER( ARG1, ARG2, ARG3)
    
    INTEGER(KIND=JPIM), INTENT(IN)  :: ARG3
    INTEGER(KIND=JPIM), INTENT(IN)  :: ARG2