You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think most of the protocol adapters will almost be identical to an existing one.
For example, the actility thingpark LoraWan network sends data to the MQTT adapter on topic "accountPrefix/things/deviceEUI/uplink" and expects control commands on topic "accountPrefix/things/deviceEUI/downlink". It consists of the same functional data as the hono topics except for the path segments to be ordered differently.
I had a brief look into the code and I think changes are limited to:
ResourceIdentifier, make IDX parameterizable:
private static final int IDX_ENDPOINT = 0;
private static final int IDX_TENANT_ID = 1;
private static final int IDX_RESOURCE_ID = 2;
EndpointType:
parameterize the constants
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think most of the protocol adapters will almost be identical to an existing one.
For example, the actility thingpark LoraWan network sends data to the MQTT adapter on topic "accountPrefix/things/deviceEUI/uplink" and expects control commands on topic "accountPrefix/things/deviceEUI/downlink". It consists of the same functional data as the hono topics except for the path segments to be ordered differently.
I had a brief look into the code and I think changes are limited to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: