लिख्, सन्

[mrudani]

By उभे अभ्यस्तम् (6.1.5) :

उभे अभ्यस्तम् (६.१.५) :

अस्य सूत्रस्य आवश्यकता नास्ति।

[drdhaval2785]

सञ्ज्ञाविधायकसूत्रप्रवृत्तिः कथं बाध्यते ? सञ्ज्ञाया उपयोगं बाधितुं शक्यते
। न सञ्ज्ञाविधानमिति मे मतिः ।

[drdhaval2785]

@mrudani

Any response?

[mrudani]

अभ्यस्तसंज्ञानिमित्तकार्याभावान्नापेक्षितमिति

[drdhaval2785]

Pending to handle at https://ambuda-org.github.io/vidyullekha/?tab=tin&dhatu=06.0092

[akprasad]

(moving from discussion on #995, where I had mistakenly posted this earlier)

@drdhaval2785 what correction should I make here? https://ambuda-org.github.io/vidyullekha/?tab=dhatu&dhatu=06.0092&sanadi=6 looks correct and consistent with e.g. Kashika Vrtti on https://ashtadhyayi.com/sutraani/1/2/26 ("लिखित्वा, लेखित्वा ; लिलिखिषति, लिलेखिषति")

[drdhaval2785]

It is a technical discussion.
@mrudani brought a point that "As there is no use of abhyasta saYjYA here, it is superfluous to show uBe aByastam rule".
It will not have any effect on the output.
Just the intermediate step should be shown or not.