-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 733
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
instrument stacks #43
Labels
Comments
Exactly, I was just exploring sysdig and was wondering if I could use the Flame graphs by @brendangregg 👍 Is there any plan for this? |
+1! |
+1 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A stack field class could be included, with stack.kernel and stack.user for retrieving each stack back trace. This would allow quick identification of the reason events occurred: code path ancestry.
A minor detail: it doesn't matter if stacks are returned multi-line (easier to read) or single-line (easier to post process). Eg, for single line, frames can be separated by ';'.
(Stack trace data can also be easily fed into Flame Graphs...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: