Replies: 1 comment
-
I guess I just let! _ = |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Sometimes I wanted to perform a bunch async job in parallel on a seq<'T>
So I am so smart I used Seq.map to turn that to seq<Async>
I now apply Async.Parallel which takes
seq<Async<unit>>
turns it toAsync<unit[]>
Now I get the point is you get the results in an array, after computing them in parallel, when you perform the computation in the future
Yet I don't need the results I just had some job to do
How do I throw
unit[]
away so I don't have to deal with itBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions