You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
I like it, I think we are on the same page that the best way to solve pub/sub is through an attached service. Thanks for linking. It is probably a good early example service to implement using the bus/job engine.
A question: a pub/sub service can generate loops with channels, like so:
session A subscribes to topic "hello"
session B subscribes to topic "hello"
session A publishes a "write" channel to to topic hello
session A receives its own channels from the broker
session B recevies a "read" channel to to topic hello
Summarizing, In jschan when a channel is received from the originating session it returns the originating channel, however, all the other parties receives the "inverted" channel. Is that the right behavior?
While it does not make any sense whatsoever to send back a channel with a normal service invocation, in pub/sub scenarios it might happen. Is this the correct behavior? Should jschan error? How this case is handled in libchan?
After seen the work done in #61 and #63, I think it's worth linking in here that I created a Graft/jschan pubsub broker: https://github.com/GraftJS/graft-broker. Graft-broker can also be backed by Redis, thanks to https://github.com/mcollina/mqemitter-redis, however you can't send channels through it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: