Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

come up with a --all-features equivalent #707

Open
zachschuermann opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

come up with a --all-features equivalent #707

zachschuermann opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@zachschuermann
Copy link
Collaborator

After the introduction of disjoint arrow feature flags in #654, only arrow_53 or arrow_54 can be specific - never both, thereby breaking --all-features. We should come up with a way to nicely work around this and provide a similar --all-features experience which just defaults to some arrow version

@hntd187
Copy link
Collaborator

hntd187 commented Feb 21, 2025

most things like tokio have a "full" feature, but they also don't bounce around versions of arrow like we have to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants