Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest improvements to quickstart layouts #5406

Open
1 task done
mirnawong1 opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Suggest improvements to quickstart layouts #5406

mirnawong1 opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

The dbt quickstarts seem a bit long (over 10-15 steps) and i wonder if that's a signal to break them down even further to help users:

  • To make an impact on dbt cloud enablement, what do we think about splitting the qs steps into diff categories of getting started so they look and feel more quick, as well as provide users with quick wins? maybe a good A/B test? For example:
  • Learn the basics (for setting dbt cloud account)
  • Connect with your data platform
  • Start with dbt Cloud
  • Build your project
  • Deploy your project
  • etc.

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/get-started-dbt

Additional information

No response

@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant