-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
System Identification using Spatial Interpolation #3
Comments
Let's continue our discussion here. I'm quoting your Email:
After the spatial interpolation, the impulse response is given as the circular cross-correlation of the sound field and the excitation signal. Yes, you need two signals having the same length Maybe it will help to look at the overall structure in #1. |
@david1412 Please check |
I will check and try out this . Thankyou |
Lines 328 to 334 in 5cc8744
You are replacing the first (or the last) element of I want to remind you that the polar angle
In the above case, only one sample is appended at each end. Notice that both |
The spline interpolation still does not works in my computer, how about in yours? |
I dont have problem with spline interpolation . it is working well and i used Linear interpolation as well. but the issue is kernel will die when i run the code after 3 hours.. |
Time-varying--MIMO/SISO4.py
Line 362 in 7485f3b
K
is the number of impulse responses we want to have at the end. It is not necessary equal toN
which is in our example800
and too many.Time-varying--MIMO/SISO4.py
Lines 413 to 427 in 7485f3b
What does
M
mean, and why is it4
?The length of each impulse response has to be
N
, andimpulse_response
should have the corresponding size. The for-loop up-toM
also does not make sense.The sub-signal has to be a decimation by a factor of
N
.phi[i::M]
does not gives the sub-signals we need.Time-varying--MIMO/SISO4.py
Lines 426 to 436 in 7485f3b
y_i = spatial_interpolation(s_i, phi_i, phi_target, interp_method)
computes the sound field at time indexi
for all target angles. Can we use this directly for the impulse response computation?If you get a
nan
in your computation, you should fix something not just ignoring it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: