You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"Consider a CNN that takes in 32×32 grayscale images and has a single convolution layer with three 5×5 convolution filters (without boundary padding)", if without boundary padding, the first convolution layer should be 3@28×28, I don't understand why the answer is 5@32×32?
"(b) How many parameters are in this model?" 5×5×3+3=78
"(d) If there were no constraints, then how many weights would there be in the ordinary feed-forward neural network in (c)?"
If the convolution layer still 32×32, then the parameters should be (32×32+1)×32×32×3 = 3148800, each pixel in the convolution layer should have a bias, I am not sure am I correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's definitely some errors here I think. Hard to know what I was thinking at the time, but I think 3 vs 5 layers is just a mis-read of the question from me and 32x32 pixels I think is also an error (I hadn't considered the boundary padding issue). This means my calculation of the number of parameters (part b) is wrong and I agree with you it should be 78.
For part d, I think you're correct, but might need a bit of time to convince myself (with the adjustment for 32 -> 28 pixels from the above error).
"Consider a CNN that takes in 32×32 grayscale images and has a single convolution layer with three 5×5 convolution filters (without boundary padding)", if without boundary padding, the first convolution layer should be 3@28×28, I don't understand why the answer is 5@32×32?
"(b) How many parameters are in this model?" 5×5×3+3=78
"(d) If there were no constraints, then how many weights would there be in the ordinary feed-forward neural network in (c)?"
If the convolution layer still 32×32, then the parameters should be (32×32+1)×32×32×3 = 3148800, each pixel in the convolution layer should have a bias, I am not sure am I correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: