Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pair diagram shows less stitches than pattern definition #229

Open
p3d2 opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Pair diagram shows less stitches than pattern definition #229

p3d2 opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@p3d2
Copy link

p3d2 commented Jun 24, 2024

Hello!

I'm trying to generate this pattern from Uta Ulrich book:
image

And I am trying to use "831R" with the tile layout (-2,1) and (2,1) to generate it.

image

However, when I move to the stitches mode, the pairs don't look correct for some reason.

image

I am likely doing something wrong, but it does not make sense to me how the 3 and R are appearing in the stitches mode.

@jo-pol jo-pol changed the title Problem generating pattern Pair diagram shows less stitches than pattern definition Jun 24, 2024
@jo-pol
Copy link
Collaborator

jo-pol commented Jun 24, 2024

Thank you for your effort to report your problem. I renamed the issue to be more specific.

The short answer: two consecutive stitches with the same two pairs are treated as a single stitch.

This PDF shows the intended thread diagram. The PDF has a link to the web site showing the diagrams. The drop down help menu explains how to create such a PDF.

The solution is based on a rose-ground with the top center stitch ignored by assigning a -. By ignoring this top stitch, the side stitches also form a single stitch with the bottom corners. The result is a Paris ground. Dropping stitches is a buggy feature but works in this case. The feature becomes problematic when dropping the bottom-center stitch, or both(!) side-center stitches. More on a slightly outdated page.

image

You made me realize the dropped stitch is missing in the enumeration of stitches.

@p3d2
Copy link
Author

p3d2 commented Jun 25, 2024

Thank you for your fast reply!

The short answer: two consecutive stitches with the same two pairs are treated as a single stitch.
Does it mean they should be dropped?

I've replicated your example, 5X-X; -7-4 (https://d-bl.github.io/GroundForge/stitches.html?patchWidth=16&patchHeight=16&tile=5X-X,-7-4&shiftColsSW=-2&shiftRowsSW=2&shiftColsSE=2&shiftRowsSE=2&a1=cttttc&d2=tcl&b2=tcr) and it's working as intended. I've also tried to redo the pattern using only 1 line 831R and now I understand my issue better. I didn't knew why the stitch '3' was being shadowed/flagged, and if it's warning that stitches will be merged, then it is a bit hard to distinguish between grays (https://d-bl.github.io/GroundForge/stitches.html?patchWidth=17&patchHeight=16&footside=R,1&tile=831R&headside=8,R&shiftColsSW=-2&shiftRowsSW=1&shiftColsSE=2&shiftRowsSE=1&s1=ct&d1=ct&c1=ct&b1=ct&a1=ct&s2=ct&e1=ctptttpct&a2=ct)

Your work is amazing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants