You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I take exception to what you wrote about SPMCHF.
The test example showed that, if a user seletect the 'all' parameters for both level 1 and level 2 and the default accuracy for each level as specified, that the Virial theorem changed as shown:
EIV : Ratio -2.000000311943682
NR : Ratio -1.999999999999929
which is essential machine precision for NR.
This code is written more in Oleg's style with default parameters. The user should be able to select only level 1 (I will check that) The parameters are always printed for each level. But you are right -- the "intelligent control' by the code needs to be tested further. But actually, I think the user should specify the defaults at compile time and then modify with command-line arguments the way Oleg always did.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I take exception to what you wrote about SPMCHF.
The test example showed that, if a user seletect the 'all' parameters for both level 1 and level 2 and the default accuracy for each level as specified, that the Virial theorem changed as shown:
EIV : Ratio -2.000000311943682
NR : Ratio -1.999999999999929
which is essential machine precision for NR.
This code is written more in Oleg's style with default parameters. The user should be able to select only level 1 (I will check that) The parameters are always printed for each level. But you are right -- the "intelligent control' by the code needs to be tested further. But actually, I think the user should specify the defaults at compile time and then modify with command-line arguments the way Oleg always did.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: