You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Planned co-working with IOER/Turing on this section
The plan is to merge 'Age' and 'Dynamics' and rename 'Age & History'. This will better signpost the section dealing with long-term dynamics for historians and heritage specialists and free up a category to enable expansion of 'Sustainability' on the 12 colour category grid.
Age & History capture spatial data at building level relating to the following:
Current building age (core and historical extensions)- numerical data input
Building survival rates - using historical raster maps + current vectorised footprints
Building lifespans for demolished buildings (for individual buildings and typologies) - numerical data input
Site histories - numerical data input
Historical information on demolished buildings - vectorised historical footprints
Extension dates add plus sign to add info and sources for each
Retrofit date -how should this be linked to sustainability section? explain what type
Verification buttons for each and sources required
2. - Building survival rates - using historical raster maps + current vectorised footprints
IMPLEMENTED: 1890s London example integrated into mapping interface with overlay of current building footprints.
TO BE IMPLEMENTED: Click on any footprint and add info on closeness of match to infer persistence/resilience of form. Select 1 option for colouring - Google Streetview may also be helpful i assessing whether original building survives :.
Colour 1 for buildings where the current structure/footprint and the historical footprint is identical or almost identical to the original;
Colour 2 for buildings where core building still exists but significant alterations have occurred
Colour 3 where the structure has been completely replaced/demolished.
Data are expected to be crowdsourced though automated techniques will be introduced once methods for vectorising historical footprints have been advanced,
5. - Building lifespans for demolished buildings (for individual buildings and typologies) - numerical data input
7. - Site histories - numerical data input
9. - Historical information on demolished buildings - vectorised historical footprints
11. - Historical sources/links- urls
with current footprints, but we would still need specialist/local contributors to confirm whether the building was just a new reconstruction on same site or the original as this obviously can't always be seen from the plan.
We also don't have vectorised footprints to work with yet Once we have a sample we can demo how vectorised historical footprints can be used to crowdsource information on the 1890 structure itself- e.g. land use at the time (so we can begin to track patterns of land use change over 130 years) and links to archive data on history of occupiers etc. as well as size, materials and typology for examples where buildings have been demolished (for extant buildings this information will be held under our main categories of 'Size', 'Typology' and 'Construction')
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
polly64
changed the title
Editing historical map layers
Long-term dynamics and historical information - Revised Age, History and Dynamics section
Dec 23, 2022
polly64
changed the title
Long-term dynamics and historical information - Revised Age, History and Dynamics section
'Age and HIstory' Renaming and merging of Age and Dynamics main categories
Dec 23, 2022
polly64
changed the title
'Age and HIstory' Renaming and merging of Age and Dynamics main categories
'Age and History' Renaming and merging of Age and Dynamics main categories
Dec 23, 2022
Planned co-working with IOER/Turing on this section
The plan is to merge 'Age' and 'Dynamics' and rename 'Age & History'. This will better signpost the section dealing with long-term dynamics for historians and heritage specialists and free up a category to enable expansion of 'Sustainability' on the 12 colour category grid.
Age & History capture spatial data at building level relating to the following:
1. - Current building age (core and historical extensions)- numerical data input
IMPLEMENTED: See: https://colouringlondon.org/view/age/2407428
TO BE IMPLEMENTED:
Verification buttons for each and sources required
2. - Building survival rates - using historical raster maps + current vectorised footprints
IMPLEMENTED: 1890s London example integrated into mapping interface with overlay of current building footprints.
TO BE IMPLEMENTED: Click on any footprint and add info on closeness of match to infer persistence/resilience of form. Select 1 option for colouring - Google Streetview may also be helpful i assessing whether original building survives :.
Colour 1 for buildings where the current structure/footprint and the historical footprint is identical or almost identical to the original;
Colour 2 for buildings where core building still exists but significant alterations have occurred
Colour 3 where the structure has been completely replaced/demolished.
Data are expected to be crowdsourced though automated techniques will be introduced once methods for vectorising historical footprints have been advanced,
with current footprints, but we would still need specialist/local contributors to confirm whether the building was just a new reconstruction on same site or the original as this obviously can't always be seen from the plan.
We also don't have vectorised footprints to work with yet Once we have a sample we can demo how vectorised historical footprints can be used to crowdsource information on the 1890 structure itself- e.g. land use at the time (so we can begin to track patterns of land use change over 130 years) and links to archive data on history of occupiers etc. as well as size, materials and typology for examples where buildings have been demolished (for extant buildings this information will be held under our main categories of 'Size', 'Typology' and 'Construction')
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: