You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just read your paper about Noise-Robust CP. When I look at the implementation, I feel confused that why you resample the calibration set, which increase the number of calibration set to n_examples * n_classes. In the paper, the number of calibration set is still n(n_example). It is just to compute the weighted average score for all labels.
It would be grateful if you can help me understand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When you compute the q_level, why you use n_examples * n_classes as n rather than n_examples. Besides that, for the weights, why it is num_class - 1 in the denominator.
Hi,
I just read your paper about Noise-Robust CP. When I look at the implementation, I feel confused that why you resample the calibration set, which increase the number of calibration set to n_examples * n_classes. In the paper, the number of calibration set is still n(n_example). It is just to compute the weighted average score for all labels.
It would be grateful if you can help me understand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: