Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add configuration steps to create a brew release #271

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

nimakaviani
Copy link
Contributor

creates the homebrew formula for idpbuilder

Theoretically everything should work but kinda tricky to test this on the actual repo, since we need to cut a release. we can give it a go after it is reviewed and merged.

brews:
- name: idpbuilder
homepage: "https://cnoe.io"
repository:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want the repository for this to be nimakaviani/homebrew-cnoe or is this for testing? I would imagine maybe we'd want to consider cnoe-io/tap as the repository. It does seem that other big projects like argocd follow the pattern of project/tap for example argo uses argoproj/tap based on documentation here https://docs.brew.sh/Taps#the-brew-tap-command

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, an oversight with the owner name. fixed, thanks!

agreed. tap is a better name. renamed the repo to publish to tap.

Copy link
Contributor

@blakeromano blakeromano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@omrishiv omrishiv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a small nit from me. This looks great, thanks!

.goreleaser.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@omrishiv omrishiv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM 🚀

@nabuskey
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this still relevant?

@cmoulliard
Copy link
Contributor

Adding idpbuilder to homebrew is definitely a plus but then the documentation should be updated

@cmoulliard
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Approved.

@cmoulliard
Copy link
Contributor

Can we go ahead and merge this PR ? Is it possible to test it (= GH Flow) to check what it is produced and to make a test to install it locally ?

@nabuskey
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix the merge conflict and we can merge imo. As for testing it in a GH workflow, I am not sure tbh. Maybe open an issue and work on it separately? I do like the idea of installing it via home brew.

@cmoulliard cmoulliard requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 14:20
@cmoulliard
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe open an issue and work on it separately? I do like the idea of installing it via home brew.

As an action should run tonight when nightly tag will be created I will review tomorrow what happened and maybe create a ticket separately

@cmoulliard cmoulliard self-requested a review January 22, 2025 14:21
@cmoulliard cmoulliard merged commit b8996ee into main Jan 22, 2025
5 checks passed
@cmoulliard cmoulliard deleted the home-brew branch January 22, 2025 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants