-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move server 3 to use new ethernet card and have external IP #95
Comments
Did we order a new network card? Does the one you showed me last time we were in the network closet work? |
I upgraded the server to new kernel and after that I have not noticed issues with the one I bought before (4 ports one) anymore. So I didn't know any new one. |
(I worry now more that server 3 might not have enough CPU power for nodewatcher. I had to move online council app to campus server because server 2 was too slow. Those servers are really meant for file sharing only.) |
Would be pretty easy and not to expensive to upgrade, especially if we get On Nov 15, 2016 01:35, "Mitar" [email protected] wrote:
|
Especially if its for all house Internet all houses can chip in a bit? On Nov 15, 2016 07:33, "James Martins" [email protected] wrote:
|
So yes, server 1 and server 2 should be probably replaced with a proper server, it does not need too much disk (2 TB), but memory is good to have (32 GB?). But the question is where to get funding from for this. So for now we will be running on server 3, and later on we can migrate this to a new server. |
Why not convert the makerspace computer into a server? it has a pretty nice server CPU (i7-5820k), decent server motherboard (ASRock Fatal1ty X99X Killer, it supports ECC if we get a XEON E5 processor even though that's probably unecessary) and honestly we could make a Windows virtual machine with PCI passthrough of a graphics card and then get an intel nuc ($100-300 Maybe BSCIT? ) into the makerspace as thin client. NX protocol is extremely responsive and if we wanted to go crazy we could have a dedicated cable and ethernet port from the server to the thin client. We would need more RAM if we were to do this though but it prevents the nice expensive makerspace computer from getting stolen. The only thing we would need then is:
so in all:
|
I think we do not need a different CPU and stuff. To my knowledge we got money to buy replacement hardware for stolen hardware, so maybe the only thing which we need is a rack-mount case and move whatever is there there. I would not go with thin client. And I would not go with changing what we have. Whatever we have is better than those file-server servers. @clohard, how is makerspace computer fixing going? |
Did we get money or hardware from BSCIT? |
Hm, we got money, but maybe then central office bought the equipment for us. This is something new they are trying this semester. |
Yeah, this semester central has been buying hardware for NM then a manager needs to go pick it up. If that be the case and we don't want to do a thin client then we would have a worthless GPU |
We can do deep-learning on the GPU. :-) |
or folding at home ^_^ On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Mitar [email protected] wrote:
|
Or we can sell the GPU. Motherboard probably have internal GPU no? |
Or we can use it as a thin client host =p. There is usually a relatively powerful iGPU in modern desktop CPUs but not server CPUs. The GPU built into the motherboard is pretty much text only. |
Good enough. :-) |
I feel like the PCI issues may be related to our 9 year old Motherboard: |
I think that since I upgraded kernel to new version there was no ethernet issues anymore. So we should just proceed and start using the new network card with public IP. |
Why use an external network card anyways, is the advantage more ports (not saying this is a negligible advantage) or is there something else going on with the motherboard's Ethernet ports? |
We need extra ports: internal network, antenna network, external network. |
Also, one can do in the future batching over all ports and achieve 4 Gbit/s throughput. |
This and #104 can probably both be fixed at the same time. This should be done via salt, correct? |
Yes. |
Let's start work on this. We have 6 physical interfaces now in the server, one card with 4 ports, and two on the mother board:
The plan is to connect:
|
This now work, but during boot it was for 60 seconds for some reason because of some network configuration issues. Not sure what.
|
So now the output of
|
The issue with network configuration was that I configured a gateway both for external IP interface and lan interface. Removing it from the lan interface solved the problem. |
I also upgraded the server to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04. |
Prerequisite for: #83
At the same time it would be useful to do: #82
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: