Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document how to deploy Kamaji on AWS #69

Open
bsctl opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #538
Open

Document how to deploy Kamaji on AWS #69

bsctl opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #538
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@bsctl
Copy link
Member

bsctl commented Jul 7, 2022

Document how to deploy and use Kamaji on AWS

@bsctl bsctl self-assigned this Jul 7, 2022
@bsctl bsctl added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 7, 2022
@prometherion prometherion added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jan 22, 2024
@prometherion
Copy link
Member

Marking this as a good first issue, also considering the recent blog post we published which could be used as a starting point.

@bsctl bsctl linked a pull request Aug 12, 2024 that will close this issue
@ilyesAj
Copy link

ilyesAj commented Jan 7, 2025

hey @bsctl @prometherion , can you elabrate more about which deploy method you want to document ? via terraform, CLI , both ?
i m setting up a cluster on AWS and i think that i can help on this issue.

@bsctl
Copy link
Member Author

bsctl commented Jan 7, 2025

@ilyesAj thank you for giving Kamaji a try. The idea is to give guidance as we made for Azure here. If you have suggestions, you're welcome. Are you available to work on it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants