-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pymbar and high/infinity energies #22
Comments
Excellent question. I'm not sure inputs containing The safest thing to do right now is to replace occurrences of In the meantime, I will make a note to add some unit tests with |
Whoops---this should not go in this issue tracker, but rather here: |
Sorry, for asking this on the wrong tracker. I guess the exp[-u] sort this out just fine. I will modify the AMBER On 10 December 2015 at 15:01, John Chodera [email protected] wrote:
|
Hi,
I am using pymbar through David Mobley's alchemical-analysis tool. I
want to do BAR/MBAR analysis with AMBER. Strangely, AMBER will
occasionally output very high energies, sometimes not even displaying
the values anymore (Fortran all '*' output), for estimates for
'far-away" lambdas.
Anyway, I am wondering what pymbar does with high energies or 'Inf'
values. I have tried to filter those out and compare with passing those
values to pymbar. It seems that the results are the same. So, what
does really happen?
Many thanks,
Hannes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: