You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue tracks the design and possible implementation of embedding the bridge node system within the consensus node (given that these processes are intended to run in tandem). The listed benefits of a complete solution here are:
Decreased computation:
Only a single construction of the EDS and DAH (as opposed to once within consensus and once within the bridge)
No need to verify headers, commits and other data (as they have already been verified by the consensus node)
A single storage solution
Reduction of the duplication of data
Cache layering system for EDS, ODS, Block, State-mutating transactions (this needs to be scoped out with a corresponding consolidated syncing solution that both core and node can use)
Remove reliance on flaky RPC layer
Error handling, retries. Problems with batch requests and dropping of responses under load
An improved UX
Node operators have a single binary and a unified convention to running them
A single process to manage consensus and the serving of data to the DA layer
For Admin Use
Not duplicate issue
Appropriate labels applied
Appropriate contributors tagged
Contributor assigned/self-assigned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue tracks the design and possible implementation of embedding the bridge node system within the consensus node (given that these processes are intended to run in tandem). The listed benefits of a complete solution here are:
For Admin Use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: