Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider refactoring our CheckTx overwrite to be an antehandler #1166

Open
evan-forbes opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Consider refactoring our CheckTx overwrite to be an antehandler #1166

evan-forbes opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
refactor optional label for items that are related to implementation work and do not change functionality

Comments

@evan-forbes
Copy link
Member

We could write our wrapper around CheckTx as an antehandler, which would likely be more of a standard thing to do.
@evan-forbes evan-forbes added the refactor optional label for items that are related to implementation work and do not change functionality label Jan 4, 2023
@evan-forbes evan-forbes mentioned this issue Aug 4, 2023
Open
@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

rootulp commented May 16, 2024

Here's a link to the CheckTx referenced in the OP.

@evan-forbes evan-forbes mentioned this issue Dec 6, 2024
Merged
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
refactor optional label for items that are related to implementation work and do not change functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rootulp @evan-forbes