You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To reduce noise on PRs, we would like if the action only added the PR comment in the case of one of the checks failing. I suggest a new action input like skip_pr_comment_on_success. Alternatively, output the comment markdown as an action output and let the user decide how to handle it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is disabling the PR comment completely by setting pr_comment: false not sufficient to solve the noise problem you have? (The action would still report the check status and annotate the difference with lint/braking errors).
Can think about this. If we do it, I would want to avoid adding another config option, but we might be able to turn pr_comment from book to more of an enum.
Hi @nicksnyder! 👋 Thanks for the quick response. If setting pr_comment: false still keeps the job step summary, then that's good enough for me. I'll close this for now. 😄
To reduce noise on PRs, we would like if the action only added the PR comment in the case of one of the checks failing. I suggest a new action input like
skip_pr_comment_on_success
. Alternatively, output the comment markdown as an action output and let the user decide how to handle it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: