You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is this part used multiwoz 2.2 or multiwoz 2.0 as a benchmark dataset.
I'm so confused, in RewardNet, Mars, KRLS original paper, all results are the same as your table, but they all reported in multiwoz 2.0 dataset. Morever, in the TOATOD paper, authors reported combined score in multiwoz 2.2 dataset.
Is there any mistakes. Can you explain this inconsistent.
Thanks !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this part used multiwoz 2.2 or multiwoz 2.0 as a benchmark dataset. I'm so confused, in RewardNet, Mars, KRLS original paper, all results are the same as your table, but they all reported in multiwoz 2.0 dataset. Morever, in the TOATOD paper, authors reported combined score in multiwoz 2.2 dataset. Is there any mistakes. Can you explain this inconsistent. Thanks !
Is this part used multiwoz 2.2 or multiwoz 2.0 as a benchmark dataset.
I'm so confused, in RewardNet, Mars, KRLS original paper, all results are the same as your table, but they all reported in multiwoz 2.0 dataset. Morever, in the TOATOD paper, authors reported combined score in multiwoz 2.2 dataset.
Is there any mistakes. Can you explain this inconsistent.
Thanks !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: