You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, dear author, thank you for your awesome work! I want to bring your attention to a possible bug in the implementation of total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma function
In lines 194-195 of file lftk/foundation/wordsent.py, the total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma function still does the lemma operation, even though no lemma is specified. This makes the "total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma" function almost identical to total_number_of_unique_words.
This will lead to an error that corr_ttr is same as corr_ttr_no_lem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
chaojiang06
changed the title
bug in the "total_number_of_unique_words" function
bug in the "total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma" function
Mar 29, 2024
chaojiang06
changed the title
bug in the "total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma" function
bug in the total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma function
Mar 29, 2024
Hi, dear author, thank you for your awesome work! I want to bring your attention to a possible bug in the implementation of
total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma
functionIn lines 194-195 of file
lftk/foundation/wordsent.py
, thetotal_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma
function still does the lemma operation, even though no lemma is specified. This makes the "total_number_of_unique_words_no_lemma" function almost identical tototal_number_of_unique_words
.This will lead to an error that
corr_ttr
is same ascorr_ttr_no_lem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: