You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are storing the size of synapse groups[1] in our connectivity matrix. We could also compute it from consecutive start indices of synapse groups in the connectivity matrix. Still, both would need two global memory reads, but one would save some memory. Though the saving would be in order of synapse groups and therefore likely negligible compared to the synapses themselves.
I feel like I should have thought of that in the past when trying to optimize for memory. Maybe we need the sizes somewhere else where we don't need the start indices, and hence accessing size with only one memory load is beneficial?
Check where we need synapse group sizes.
[1] synapse groups are all synapses for one (preID, postGroup) - pair
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are storing the size of synapse groups[1] in our connectivity matrix. We could also compute it from consecutive start indices of synapse groups in the connectivity matrix. Still, both would need two global memory reads, but one would save some memory. Though the saving would be in order of synapse groups and therefore likely negligible compared to the synapses themselves.
I feel like I should have thought of that in the past when trying to optimize for memory. Maybe we need the sizes somewhere else where we don't need the start indices, and hence accessing size with only one memory load is beneficial?
Check where we need synapse group sizes.
[1] synapse groups are all synapses for one (preID, postGroup) - pair
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: