Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide which terms from Algebra 2 we want in the glossary for each lesson. #2349

Open
flannery-denny opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@flannery-denny
Copy link
Collaborator

Just noticed that quadratics 2 explicitly teaches about horizontal shift, vertical shift and quadratic coefficient, but only vertical shift is in the lesson glossary. When I scan the lesson there are many terms that could be in the glossary and it's hard to decide which to include or not include.

I think this task would best be tackled on a zoom call where we scan the lessons together and talk about why we should or shouldn't include various terms.

@schanzer
Copy link
Member

schanzer commented Jan 13, 2025

NOTE: not including terms for coefficients of any polynomial (e.g. - "base"), because they literally mean different things in different polynomials

Words to add:

  • linear1: model, correlation
  • linear2:
  • linear3:
  • quadratic2: y-intercept
  • exponential1 - model,
  • exponential2 - growth factor
  • logarithms2 - logarithm

@flannery-denny flannery-denny modified the milestones: January 15, 2025, 2025 Jan 15, 2025
@flannery-denny
Copy link
Collaborator Author

flannery-denny commented Jan 15, 2025

@schanzer I'm seeing the following 2 warnings when I make

WARNING: Item "symmetric" not found in glossary

  • Should we add symmetric data to the glossary? Or remove @vocab reference to it?

WARNING: Item "base" not found in glossary

  • It looks like you removed the definition for base from the glossary rather than moving the Alg 2 reference to it. It appears to be referenced many times in other lessons.

schanzer pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
@flannery-denny

This comment has been minimized.

@schanzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants