-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LazyAssertion not open for extension #284
Comments
Happy to accept a PR. Please make sure you provide an example in a test covering the extension as an example usage. Also please read https://github.com/beberlei/assert/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md. Looking forward to seeing this! |
PR #285 has been created for this. If you could, at your convenience, have a look and let me know what you think of it. I've made sure that:
|
@rquadling nudging you as a gentle reminder to get your feedback on my PR. Thanks in advance. |
Hi. Sorry! Looking. |
See the PR for my comments. Please rebase onto master for more uptodate pipeline checks and consistencies. |
Thanks for the review, I'll pick it up from here. |
I've had to release a fix for some BC's. Can you rebase and fix please? |
@rquadling will do a rebase but still havent found the time to makes changes based your review. |
Leaving the PR for what it is. Ive no longer need the changes proposed in this PR. If somebody wants to take over feel free. |
I wanted to extend the LazyAssertion in order to overload the
that
method. As I need to pass some additional details into the exception created by the assertion lib.With all the properties on the LazyAssertion are private this doesn't allow for easy extending.
Would you be willing to accept a PR which would change the properties on the LazyAssertion from private too protected? (Like the Assert class already has, which can easily be extended)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: