-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About preview functionality bugs which seems have been fixed #3405
Comments
With simple testing, "PR checks not updating by amplify" issues might occur again or have not been fixed yet. |
Hi @clichedmoog thanks for bringing this to our attention. We are investigating these issues further to determine next steps. We will update this issue once we have reproduced/tested these mechanisms again. |
They have not been fixed. There are multiple problems with preview feature that are incredibly annoying:
|
same feeling We are running monorepo with 3 web app deploying on amplify and hard to identify the url No expecting to customise but please at least include project name in the message so easier to identify |
Before opening, please confirm:
App Id
https://ap-northeast-2.console.aws.amazon.com/amplify/home?region=ap-northeast-2#/d2jveo7g4jys2l
AWS Region
ap-northeast-2
Amplify Hosting feature
Web previews
Question
I have some questions about the bugs that seemed to have been fixed.
In the past, I was annoyed by certain issues, including the fact that resources (such as S3, Lambda@Edge, and CloudFront) were not deleted even after the preview was closed (issues #2424, #2273, and #2123).
Additionally, I noticed that the PR checks from GitHub remained "In progress" or “failed” when they failed and were redeployed in Amplify.
And cannot re-trigger builds with click the “re-run” button from GitHub (issues #367 #3287, #3261)
When I reached out to AWS support using a support case, they indicated that these issues seemed to have been resolved, but were not entirely certain.
Could you confirm whether or not these preview-related bugs have indeed been fixed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: