-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use @javax.annotation.processing.Generated
after moving to Java 9+
#194
Comments
…choose between javax.annotation.Generated and jakarta.annotation.Generated. Or if you really do not want any no annotation (not recommended).
…can now choose between javax.annotation.Generated and jakarta.annotation.Generated. Or if you really do not want any no annotation (not recommended)." This reverts commit 3d0a7eb.
+1 |
@joel-costigliola , any reason why the jakarta support doesn't get merged? |
just lack of time, the generator is currently in a limbo state because of that ... |
Team decision: We will start the development of the next major version with Java 17 as a baseline to better aid records and jakarta support. |
FWIW, in JDK 21, Manually replacing with |
@scordio Any way we can help? We keep writing assertion classes and would much rather spend the time here. 😅 |
Hi @reitzig, I appreciate the offer! 🙂 nothing special where you could help, I'm afraid: I'm upgrading dependencies and aligning the parent POM to the latest version, which already brings a few challenges due to the custom JUnit 4 rules... once this is over, it should be possible to speed up the other topics. I'll keep you posted. |
Additional team decision: we will stick to |
@javax.annotation.processing.Generated
after moving to Java 9+
I was able to force v3.0.0-M3 on v2.2.0 of the Maven plugin and can confirm: this is fixed. Thanks! |
Very cool, thanks for checking! |
all javax modules are being replaced with jakarta, this includes
@javax.annotation.Generated
. This is replaced by@jakarta.annotation.Generated
, allow users to choose which annotation they want on the generated classes.(I'm also creating a PR for this.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: