Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: Missing Package for Archivematica Storage Service Installation #2015

Open
5 tasks
cneal111 opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks

Comments

@cneal111
Copy link

Please describe the problem you'd like to be solved
I'm following the documentation for the Rocky Linux 9/RHEL Archivematica installation (docs)

step 5: Install Archivematica Storage Service results in a failure in a RHEL 9 env.

I'm receiving an output of:

yum install -y python-pip archivematica-storage-service

Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Red Hat Satellite Client 6 for RHEL 9 x86_64 (RPMs)                                                                                                         54 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:00    
Zabbix7.0-x86_64-RHEL9                                                                                                                                      42 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
ISO Splunk Packages                                                                                                                                         40 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 for x86_64 - Supplementary (RPMs)                                                                                                69 kB/s | 3.7 kB     00:00    
duosecurity-el9-x86_64                                                                                                                                      61 kB/s | 2.1 kB     00:00    
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 for x86_64 - AppStream (RPMs)                                                                                                    68 kB/s | 4.5 kB     00:00    
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Server - EPEL RPMs (Everything) - x86_64                                                                                         60 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Red Hat Virtualization 4 Tools for RHEL 9 x86_64 (RPMs)                                                                                                     63 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:00    
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 for x86_64 - BaseOS (RPMs)                                                                                                       63 kB/s | 4.1 kB     00:00    
Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for RHEL 9 x86_64 (RPMs)                                                                                                    79 kB/s | 4.5 kB     00:00    
Package python3-pip-21.3.1-1.el9.noarch is already installed.
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides policycoreutils-python needed by archivematica-storage-service-0.19.0-1.x86_64 from archivematica
  - nothing provides python36-devel needed by archivematica-storage-service-0.19.0-1.x86_64 from archivematica
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Describe the solution you'd like to see implemented
If there is a workaround already in place updating the current documentation would be sufficient. Doing some research it seems that policycoreutils-python has been renamed in RHEL 9 but not sure how to approach the situation.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I've attempted to install the newly named package, and create a symlink but my attempts were unsuccessful; The installation for archivematica-storage-service was still looking for policycoreutils-python. I could have possibly configured something wrong in the process. Please feel free to attempt my alternative solution.

Additional context
RHEL 9
python3.9


For Artefactual use:

Before you close this issue, you must check off the following:

  • All pull requests related to this issue are properly linked
  • All pull requests related to this issue have been merged
  • A testing plan for this issue has been implemented and passed (testing plan information should be included in the issue body or comments)
  • Documentation regarding this issue has been written and merged
  • Details about this issue have been added to the release notes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant