Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Problem: we lack confirmation that checksum verification de-duplication results in a performance improvement #78

Closed
jrwdunham opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Problem: we lack confirmation that checksum verification de-duplication results in a performance improvement #78

jrwdunham opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Columbia University Library CUL: phase 2

Comments

@jrwdunham
Copy link
Contributor

AM PR 1012 aimed to increase the efficiency of checksum verification. We need a feature file that describes our expectation that this change results in a performance improvement and we need that feature file to provide an automated confirmation of that expectation.
@jrwdunham jrwdunham self-assigned this Mar 23, 2018
@jrwdunham jrwdunham added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Mar 23, 2018
@jrwdunham jrwdunham added the Status: ready The issue is sufficiently described/scoped to be picked up by a developer. Waffle label. label Mar 23, 2018
@nickwilkinson nickwilkinson removed this from the 1.8.0 milestone Apr 24, 2018
@sromkey sromkey removed the Status: ready The issue is sufficiently described/scoped to be picked up by a developer. Waffle label. label Aug 23, 2018
@ross-spencer ross-spencer mentioned this issue Dec 17, 2018
Open
@ross-spencer
Copy link
Contributor

ross-spencer commented Sep 11, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Closing as we are a number of releases past 1.8 now and it seems unlikely we would go back to confirm this via experiment. Performance metrics for future releases are however in the works so this will be easier to tackle moving forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Columbia University Library CUL: phase 2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@ross-spencer @jrwdunham @sromkey @nickwilkinson