You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey @blogcraft by the looks of it the chart is behaving unexpectedly due to mismatch in the number of entries for the chart B. Some timestamps seems to be missing once you fill those up it should behave as expected.
Missing values: 1688097600000, 1672455600000, 1675134000000
Do let me know if you face any issues even after adding the missing values!
It is true that some data is missing, and it is ok to be missing. I can't just invent a value, not even 0. the thing is that the behaviour is inconsistent, and it should not act as it currently does. The behaviour should be that is there is no data in a date them not show a value.
@blogcraft I'm not sure if stacked charts would fit your usecase then, could you explain more on what your use case is and what you expect to see on the graph when values are missing? This could help in defining the behaviour for these cases if it fits for these kinds of charts.
Description
I have a Stacked Area Chart with n Series. But for some reason some series just go nuts when drawn in screen.
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Behavior
Chart should visually represent the data
Actual Behavior
Chart don't represent the data.
Screenshots
Just C Series (looks good):
A + B Series (still ok).
But add B + C (and C gets mad!)
All Combined:
Reproduction Link
https://jsfiddle.net/jysntgfr/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: