Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CCT Deviation #6

Open
markuh29 opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

CCT Deviation #6

markuh29 opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@markuh29
Copy link

markuh29 commented Sep 2, 2024

I've found that the online tool doesn't calculate CCT correctly as my spectrometer and other tools give me a different CCT value for my spd data. I'm no expert but I think this is not optimal for accurate results. I only tested daylight balanced lights.

@scottdyer
Copy link

There are several different method used to calculate CCT. Each has pros/cons. I'd have to check what is being used in this code but I would assume it's probably McCamy's cubic approxiation method, because it is simple and quick to implement. However, it might be good to add later support for multiple methods, such as:

  • NIST Method, Parabolic fit
  • McCamy's Cubic Approximation (1992)
  • Robertson's Method (1968)
  • Hernandez-Andres, Lee, & Romero (1999)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants