You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Optimize finds optimal add/drop pairs sequentially, which is highly interpretable but suboptimal. It'd be better to allow all add/drops to find the optimal roster, then post-process to determine a priority list of add/drop pairs.
Optimize roster allowing any number of adds and drops
If more drops than adds, re-optimize to find who to drop first
For Max(adds, remaining drops), re-optimize to find a priority for add/drop pairs
Perhaps allowing waiver wire claims for adds should be an optional input to Optimize, to isolate that capability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Optimize finds optimal add/drop pairs sequentially, which is highly interpretable but suboptimal. It'd be better to allow all add/drops to find the optimal roster, then post-process to determine a priority list of add/drop pairs.
Perhaps allowing waiver wire claims for adds should be an optional input to Optimize, to isolate that capability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: