-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 653
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The belndmask is not so good #188
Comments
I also encountered the same problem. The scores for detecting people or cars are very low |
Hi, cty-xiaobai! |
Hi,have you ran the evaluation program? The value of AP should be correct |
ýou need to set the threshold value lower. E.g --confidence-threshold 0.20 |
I also found this problem, especially on small data sets. I built my own data set and used coco pre training model. There are only 200 training pictures. Using maskrcnn to train 50 iters can quickly achieve high recognition rate. But with blendmask, even if you train more than 200 iters, you can only get a small score. And some objects in the scene can't be recognized at all. |
i have the same problems, and the blendmask is in poor performance on my single object dataset, how to improve its performance, have any idea? |
Hi, I test the blendmask and MaskRcnn in detectron2. The first image is the original image, the second is MaskRcnn, the third is belndmask. And you can see the belndmask is not so good. I guess the multi-scale problem is not effectively solved. And the attention is not very useful. Maybe we can adjust it?
If anyone has a better solution, welcome to discuss it with me. Thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: