-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 653
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about CondInst #137
Comments
@jinfagang the mask head does not use the |
@tianzhi0549 I see.. does it need retrain the model if open |
Yes, because the number of generated parameters is changed. |
@tianzhi0549 Does there any model provided with disable boxes? Hoping to see the model performance without detector for instance segmentation task. |
@tianzhi0549 The results are reported in Table 3 of our paper. We do not have the model for this implementation. |
@tianzhi0549 Will u consider update such a model? I think just resnet50 is enough for comparasion. Also, I have one last question, even it can be disable in:
It still need a value of:
It would be great if you guys can provide just one model without detector! |
@jinfagang 1) Sorry, we do not have such a plan. 2) The number of instances will be the number of positive locations determined by the classification branch. |
From the paper it shows CondInst using FCOS output directly feed into mask head generate mask. While looking into the code, it still using proposals (which compute every coodinates of boxes) then feed into mask head for predict mask.
my question is, if using features directly from FCOS outputs, why it necessary wrap it into Instance object which is a list of bboxes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: