Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize propagate_sync #389

Open
beomki-yeo opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Generalize propagate_sync #389

beomki-yeo opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority

Comments

@beomki-yeo
Copy link
Collaborator

See the introductory slides from here

Currently propagate_sync function naively synchronizes the actor operation on the sensitive surfaces.
But we would want to synchronize it on the passive surfaces as well in a certain situation, so we can think of adding a config or option to propagator class. Another problem of the current implementation is that there still can be thread divergence in the synchronized actor when the tracks are on the sensitive surfaces but with different mask types. (e.g. one track is in pixel region and the other is in strip region, or one in end cap region and the other in barrel region)

I don't know how much gain we would get out of this, but still interesting to investigate

@beomki-yeo beomki-yeo added enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority labels Feb 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant