We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing Faraday will reduce the dependencies, but should also allow us to take a little more control over the underlying library.
See excon/excon#682 for example, something we should be able to resolve easily by changing settings, but this is not possible because of https://github.com/lostisland/faraday/blob/master/lib/faraday/adapter/excon.rb#L22-L24.
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
➤ Matthew O'Riordan commented:
This may no longer apply given #197 ( https://github.com/ably/ably-ruby/pull/197|smart-link )
Sorry, something went wrong.
@mattheworiordan Do you think we should still remove Faraday? What benefit will this bring to the codebase?
No branches or pull requests
Removing Faraday will reduce the dependencies, but should also allow us to take a little more control over the underlying library.
See excon/excon#682 for example, something we should be able to resolve easily by changing settings, but this is not possible because of https://github.com/lostisland/faraday/blob/master/lib/faraday/adapter/excon.rb#L22-L24.
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: